EMMA RADUCANU kept up her exceptional record at grand slam events as she dispatched fellow US Open champion Sloane Stephens in the first round of the Australian Open.
The 19-year-old has struggled for form since her triumph in New York back in September but claimed a 6-0, 2-6, 6-1 victory over the world number 67.
It now means the British star has won 11 of the 12 grand slam matches she has played in her career thus far.
Raducanu had a disrupted break after a battle with Covid-19 and had lost in straight sets in the first round to Rybakina at last week’s Sydney International.
She was back on form here though as she lost just four points in a first set that was admittedly woeful from Stephens.
The American hit error after error, giving Raducanu numerous opportunities for winners in a set that lasted just 17 minutes.
Stephens hit her stride in the second set though which set up a first ever decider at this level for Raducanu.
She could not have handled it any better, striking the ball with confidence and claiming victory after an hour and 45 minutes.
The American looked a star in the making when she reached the semi-finals in Australia nine years ago but she has struggled to consistently hit those same heights since other than her US Open win in 2017.
If there was evidence here of Raducanu’s greenness, there was also plenty of the prodigious ball-striking that wowed fans and players alike at Wimbledon and the US Open, and the competitive steel that was just as important in her success.
At one point, she broke Stephens to lead 2-0 and then overcame an embarrassing moment when she thought she had won the next game only to be told it was only 40-15.
Raducanu said: “I think both me and Sloane really put everything out there and gave it all we had.
“I thought it was a really high-quality match with some really long rallies.
“I’m very happy to have come through against such a great champion like her.”
The US Open champion will now face Montenegro’s Danka Kovinic in the second round.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here