CHARLIE NICHOLAS has issued a warning to Billy Gilmour insisting that the Chelsea midfielder must produce more when pulling on the Scotland jersey.
The former Rangers kid burst onto the international scene a year ago when he was selected for Steve Clarke's Euro 2020 squad.
Gilmour starred against England at Wembley and he has been an ever-present in the Scots midfield since.
Nicholas has not been impressed though, and he believes that the 20-year-old "could end up becoming the next Barry Bannan".
He wrote in the Scottish Daily Express: "Billy Gilmour is a talented player but if he is not careful he could end up becoming the next Barry Bannan.
"Gilmour is a tidy footballer but he has to offer more and we need to stop making him out to be our saviour. He struggled in the play-off because he didn't get on the ball enough - and when he did it was square pass, square pass.
"Let's hope he can make a greater impact than Bannan - another physically small midfelder who did OK for a few seasons but failed to hit the heights everyone hoped."
Nicholas also criticised Steve Clarke's team selection for Scotland's defeat against Ukraine in the World Cup play-off semi-final.
He continued: "Clarke made mistakes in terms of selection and the set-up and he needs to shoulder that responsibility.
"The players also have to take their share of the blame because they didn't perform on the night. There's no way
"Clarke would have instructed them to keep playing back to front and missing out the midfield.
"Between them they got it all wrong and we were well beaten.
"Aaron Hickey might have a decent right foot but he rarely plays at right wing-back and putting him in there was the wrong call.
"That wasn't the first time Clarke has started a player on his weaker side.
"He did the same with Kieran Tierney early in his Scotland reign and that didn't work either.
"Why couldn't he have played Stuart Armstrong or Ryan Christie at right wing-back?
"With his starting line-up, Clarke handed the initiative to Ukraine before a ball was even kicked."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel