Transgender women do not have as much muscle mass as cisgender men but have higher levels than cisgender women, according to small new study.
Researchers said their new research could help “inform policy” about decisions on the participation of transgender women in sporting events.
The study, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, examined muscle strength as well as heart and lung capacity among transgender women who had been taking long-term gender-affirming hormone therapy.
This was compared with men and women who are cisgender – which means their gender identity matches their biological sex at birth.
Experts, led by a team in Sao Paulo, Brazil, wanted to assess the impact of long-term oestrogen therapy, and the prior exposure to testosterone during puberty, on performance.
They conducted an analysis on 15 transgender women with an average age of 32, who had received hormone therapy for an average of 14 years.
They also examined 13 cisgender men and 14 cisgender women.
None of the participants was as athlete and all had similar levels of physical activity.
Researchers examined cardiopulmonary – heart and lung – function when participants were using a treadmill.
They also assessed strength through hand grip tests and assessed body fat and muscle mass.
Total body fat was lower among the transgender women than it was among the cisgender women, but higher than it was among the cisgender men.
Similarly, muscle mass was higher among the transgender women than it was among the cisgender women, but lower than it was among the cisgender men.
Grip strength was also greater in the transgender women than it was among the cisgender women, as was cardiopulmonary function.
“These findings add new insights to the sparse information available on a highly controversial topic about the participation of transgender women in physical activities,” the authors wrote.
They added: “These findings could inform policy and help in decisions about the participation of transgender women in sporting activities.
“Future studies involving transgender athletes that account for and quantify variable exposure times to pubertal development and assess muscle cell metabolism are needed to elucidate the effects of long-term gender-affirming hormone therapy on transgender women sports performance.”
Commenting on the study, Dr Channa Jayasena, clinical senior lecturer and consultant in reproductive endocrinology and andrology at Imperial College London, said: “This small yet well-designed study compared lots of measurements linked to physical performance in transwomen, cisgender women and cisgender men.
“They found differences in muscle development, strength and oxygen usage between the transwomen and cisgender women.
“This suggests that there are likely to be small differences in how the muscles work between trans and cisgender women.
“However, none of the participants were athletes. And it is possible that there are similar differences in muscle function are found among cis-gender athletes.”
Alun Williams, professor of sport and exercise genomics at Manchester Metropolitan University, added: “This new evidence doesn’t support the eligibility of transwomen for the female categories of most sports.
“Studies of well-trained athletes before and during their treatment, using tests that are more accurate and more relevant to competitive sport, are required to better inform sport eligibility policies.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel