MANAGER Steven Hammell hailed Motherwell’s five-star performance at Ross County and claimed his side had been threatening to do it for several weeks.
Kevin van Veen scored a hat-trick, with Callum Slattery and Joe Efford also finding the net for the Staggies.
He said: “It’s not our best performance of the season, I think our level of performance has been high most games this season.
“We probably created more chances in other games but the difference is how clinical we were. It is something we highlight and work to being clinical in the final third and it’s good to see it coming.
“We highlighted to the staff that we have played well most games this season. But if the results didn’t match that and the points on the board didn’t match that performance, there is only so long we can say that. Things would have to change.
“If results like that didn’t start coming we might need to be more pragmatic, but we want to stick to the style we have and some of the goals we scored were magnificent.”
Van Veen opened the scoring from the penalty spot after 25 minutes and Motherwell went 2–0 up five minutes into the second half when Callum Slattery fired in a powerful low drive.
Van Veen scored the third and Efford made it four in the 59th minute with a thunderous drive from 18 yards, before Van Veen secured his hat-trick two minutes from time.
Ross County boss Malky Mackay said he was embarrassed by his own performance after his team were beaten so easily.
“I want to apologise to our fans for having to watch what they did,” he said. “I am embarrassed by my own performance, so I want to give an apology from me to them.
“They have been fantastic since I got here and the backing they have given the team and they had to watch that second half.
“We started the first half reasonably well and the penalty came against the run of play.
“We were quite attack-minded and got in high areas of the pitch, but the ball seems to be rolling the other side of the post.
“But the second half was awful and that is something we have to address. I am deeply disappointed.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here