ANGE POSTECOGLOU says he knew the mistake that cost Celtic in RB Leipzig was coming as his side had veered away from their football, and that they put goalkeeper Joe Hart under unnecessary pressure by playing too safe.
The Celtic manager defended his keeper after his errant pass had led to RB Leipzig’s second goal in the 3-1 defeat, but criticised his outfield players for retreating into their shells after Jota had pulled them level on the night, and for playing negative passes.
That was the mindset that he feels led to the hosts gaining the upper hand in what had been a keenly contested encounter, and what ultimately caused Hart’s costly error.
‘’It’s not about the mistake,” Postecoglou said. “It’s about before then we had a lot of the ball but were just passing it back to him. You are doing what you think is safe but it’s not really who we are.
“In the first half we played balls that were on and sometimes we’d make a mistake and that was okay because we were trying to be positive. I just felt after we scored we almost settled for that and kept passing the ball back to him.
“A mistake is a mistake. It’s not about that it’s about what the lead up to that was. Are we playing our football? Are we showing the same sort endeavour as we were before?
“I could see it coming. If it wasn’t Joe making the mistake, it would have been somebody else. When you get into survival mode, the best you are going to do is survive.
“When you come away from home in a game like this, when you’ve fought so hard to claw your way back into it, you don’t want to survive. You want to sustain a positive mindset. That’s how you affect the opposition and make them uncomfortable.
“It’s just experience – players are people you know. At some point they’ll switch into some kind of safety mode. But you can’t play safe at this level. If you play for survival then that’s all you are going to get. And to survive, you aren’t really getting anywhere.
“It’s something we’ll learn from.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel