TENNIS Australia has said it will leave the nation’s government to determine whether or not former world number one Novak Djokovic can enter the country ahead of January’s Australian Open.
The governing body has no plans to make any representations on behalf of Djokovic, who is unvaccinated against Covid-19 and subject to a three-year ban from entering Australia but can apply to immigration minister Andrew Giles for an exemption.
Earlier this year, Djokovic was deported from Australia days before the start of the Open as the Australian government ruled he may have disrupted civil order and his presence undermined the nation’s pandemic response.
At Wednesday’s launch for the 2023 Open, Tennis Australia chief executive Craig Tiley told reporters: “What we’re saying at this point is that Novak and the federal government need to work out the situation. And then we’ll follow any instruction after that.
“I did spend some time with Novak at the Laver Cup. We spoke generally. He said that he’d obviously love to come back to Australia, but he knows it’s going to be an ultimate decision for the federal government.
“He’s accepted that position. It’s a private matter between them. We’d like to welcome Novak back – he’s a nine-time champion.”
Tiley said the entry deadline for the tournament was in December and that Djokovic would need to have his eligibility determined by then.
Tiley also said that players from Russia and Belarus – who were banned from Wimbledon this summer – remained eligible to compete, although Russian players would not be able to represent their nation and instead play as independent athletes under a neutral banner.
“Like every other player they will have to go through a (visa) application process,” he said.
“The only difference would be that they cannot represent Russia, they cannot represent the flag of Russia, and they can’t participate in any activity such as (playing) the anthem of Russia, and have to play as independent players under a neutral (country) name.
“But they will be welcome to the Australian Open in January.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here