Frustrated Stephen Robinson has admitted he's unsure what VAR is there for after a handball decision was reportedly not checked in the match between Ross County and St Mirren.
The visitors were convinced they should have had a penalty when Ryan Leak handled in the Ross County penalty area.
However, Sky Sports report the incident was not checked by VAR officials with only a potential shirt pull on James Bolton by Leak reviewed for a possible penalty.
The match was broadcast live on Sky Sports and pundits James McFadden and Kris Boyd slaughtered the missed handball as commentator Ian Crocker revealed the incident was not checked.
St Mirren manager Robinson was left frustrated but not surprised at the VAR storm at full-time after his side rescued a point courtesy of a late Toyosi Olusanya goal.
He said: "My view was miles away but I've seen it back, it hits a hand and apparently that wasn't checked so I'm not sure what VAR is there for then."
READ MORE: Ross County 1 St Mirren 1: Olusanya late goal cancels out White strike
The Buddies boss added: "I can't say I'm surprised! Frustrating, yeah. Did we earn the right to win the game? Potentially not.
"But if that decision goes our way we are certainly back in the game a lot quicker and we can relax a little bit more.
"We had opportunities to win it at the end with our own decisions as opposed to relying on VAR."
Quizzed on whether he would seek an apology from referee chief Crawford Allan or the Scottish FA over the decision, Robinson said: "No. It doesn't change anything. There is no point bleating about it, it's not going to change anything.
"There is no point moaning about it, they are not going to change their mind."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here