The SPFL will not follow the Premier League's lead in asking clubs to play 'God Save The King' at matches this weekend to mark the Coronation weekend.
Instead, Herald and Times Sport understands that the decision will be left to Scottish teams individually to decide whether they will honour the occasion.
The decision comes after the SFA and SPFL offered clubs multiple options to pay respect to The Queen following her death back in September.
Matches across the country were controversially cancelled before clubs were urged to honour the death when play resumed.
Playing the national anthem before kick-off was suggested or a more traditional minute's silence was also advised.
Rangers were the only club in Scotland to play the anthem, with others opting for the moment of relection.
Last week it was reported that the Premier League in England had contacted clubs to "strongly suggest" that they play the national anthem prior to matches this weekend.
It is also understood that clubs will be sent an official portrait of The King, The Queen Consort and the Coronation logo to be displayed on big screens in stadiums while the anthem is sounded.
A suggested PA system announcement has also been sent and an article in the matchday programme to note the Coronation has also been proposed.
Fears have been raised over the anthem being played during Liverpool's match against Brentford at the weekend, with sections of the Anfield support having booed the anthem in the past.
Asked if he had an opinion on the subject, Jurgen Klopp said yesterday: "No, that’s a club decision. I am the German guy in the club, so what should I say about that?
"That would be really great. If my opinion would count even, it’s nothing to do with me."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article