DISAPPOINTED David Martindale lamented the ‘schoolboy error’ that allowed Celtic to hit the front in their win over his Livingston team, but he admitted that the visitors deserved their victory after working harder than his players – even when they went down to 10 men.
The Livingston manager was hugely frustrated with his side after handing Celtic the initiative, as defender Luiyi De Lucas tripped Reo Hatate in the area to allow the midfielder to give the visitors a crucial early lead.
And Martindale was irked that his men had subsequently been outworked after Joe Hart saw red for a foul on Livi attacker Mo Sangare.
READ MORE: Celtic player ratings as Matt O'Riley inspires win over Livingston
“I’m disappointed,” Martindale said.
“They have a schoolboy error for the first goal because he’s not going anywhere and he puts his foot out. If he scores from there, we’ll ask ourselves questions. But we give a penalty away from that.
“I’m really, really disappointed. I didn’t think there was a lot in the game at that point. The shape and the system wasn’t too bad at that point. I think we are fairly competitive in the game at that point. In all honesty, we were probably better 11 v 11.
“In the second half after that second goal I think Celtic were worth their money. I thought they worked a lot harder than us all over the park.
“Their application, their endeavour, their desire was probably a lot better than what we showed against 10 men. Sitting here, I’m hugely frustrated at the result, but I don’t think we deserved more from the game in all honesty.
READ MORE: Livingston 0 Celtic 3: Ten men of Celtic coast to win over Livi
“We are probably not expected to get anything from the game with 11 v 11. But, when Celtic go down to 10 men after 30 minutes, I’m not having that we shouldn’t expect to get something from the game.
“Expectations go up at the that point, but the harsh reality is we got beat 2-0 with 10 men.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel