THE master of the fire fighting support vessel Tharos, which was
alongside Piper Alpha on the night of the disaster, replied for the
first time yesterday to the many criticisms made by survivors.
Alastair Letty, who became the on-scene commander during and after the
disaster, told the public inquiry at Aberdeen: ''The criticisms levelled
at myself and my crew were unwarranted and unjust.''
He added: ''I do not believe that anybody who was not there on that
night can imagine the magnitude and speed at which events took place,''
said Mr Letty, 42, of Sidmouth, Devon. ''It should be remembered that on
the night of the disaster, all those who witnessed it experienced the
disaster first hand as it was unfolding, without knowledge of what was
to happen next.
''There must be very few disasters which occur in which the rescuers
are confronted with this situation.''
Mr Letty pointed out that the multi-function Tharos was never designed
to be a rapid intervention vessel, but was built for the later stages of
a disaster. For example, her fire-fighting capabilities could be used to
kill rogue wells. He said that the water pumps on jet mode are so
powerful they can cut through steel, and cannot be used without
endangering personnel still on board.
Mr Letty also revealed for the first time that the Tharos pulled back
from the blazing Piper Alpha rig not because of the intense heat and
flames, but from fear of noxious gas. He said he was advised to do so
from on shore, either by the coastguard marine co-ordination centre at
Aberdeen, or by Occidental's operations HQ in the city.
''I had one hand set radio to one ear and one to the other,'' said Mr
Letty. ''It is difficult talking to two people and listening to them at
the same time.'' But he believed the advice came from Occidental, and it
was to pull clear due to the possibility of the noxious gas hydrogen
sulphide.
The inquiry heard that this withdrawal was logged one hour and
fourteen minutes after the first explosion on Piper Alpha. About two
minutes afterwards there was another enormous explosion, which Mr Letty
said he believed was the biggest of the disaster, in which 167 men died.
This set the sea alight, and created an island of fire measuring 100ft
across to the north of the disintegrating platform.
Mr. Letty said he hoped his statement and evidence ''will have refuted
criticisms.''
He added: ''I wish to express my admiration of all the people who
assisted with the rescue efforts, in particular the crews of the fast
rescue craft, especially the Silver Pit, Lowland Cavalier, and
Sandhaven.''
Several survivors have told the inquiry that they had expected the
Tharos to go in close to Piper Alpha and deploy its hydraulically
operated gangway to bridge the gap between it and the platform for
possible evacuation. But Mr Letty, the oil installation manager on
Tharos, explained that the fireboom on which the gangway is situated was
fully retracted on July 6 last year in readiness for a lifting operation
planned for the following day.
Mr Letty said the fireboom is extended by means of ''gripper jacks''
which slot forward two feet at a time. The fireboom is very large and
heavy, and each operation takes five or six minutes, meaning it takes
between 75 and 90 minutes to extend it by 30ft, and more than three
hours to reach its maximum of about 80ft. Then it will take an
additional seven or eight minutes to deploy the gangway by haydraulic
trolley.
Asked by Mr Ian Truscott, advocate for the Piper Alpha trade union
group, whether it would have been better if this operation could have
been done more quickly, Mr Letty said no. He said the Tharos was not
designed to be a rapid intervention vessel, and this was another
illustration of that.
The inquiry continues.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article