SHADOW Scottish Secretary George Robertson has demanded answers from
Scottish Secretary Ian Lang on his choice of advisers for appointments
to the controversial new public water authorities, following disclosures
about the company's financial position.
Writing to Mr Lang yesterday, Mr Robertson questioned the
qualifications of consultants Andrew Rait Ltd of Edinburgh in the light
of disclosures that the company had declared losses of about #50,000 for
the past three years, had its accounts qualified in each of these years,
and has accounts for 1993 showing liabilities exceeding assets by almost
#60,000.
He has demanded answers to these questions:
* How many firms tendered for the Scottish Office contract?
* How was the tendering process advertised?
* What checks are made on the financial viability of companies chosen
to advise on key appointments?
* What information was taken into account in assessing the financial
status of the company?
The Scottish Office responded yesterday by saying it was satisfied
that Andrew Rait Ltd, who have been contracted to advise on the
appointment of chief executives to the three new water authorities,
could perform the task given to it.
A Scottish Office spokeswoman said: ''Andrew Rait Ltd was selected
through competitive tendering, and it is Scottish Office practice to
carry out financial checks on firms shortlisted for contracts. This case
was no exception.
''Mr Rait informed us of the financial circumstances of his firm and
the reasons for them -- basically that profits had been invested in a
pensions fund -- and we were and remain satsified that Andrew Rait Ltd
is fully capable of carrying through to completion the task given to
them.''
The Scottish Office advertised last week for the heads of the three
water authorities who will earn a basic salary of #80,000 a year before
performance-related bonuses are paid.
In his letter to the Scottish Secretary, Mr Robertson says checks on
Andrew Rait Ltd pose serious questions as to how the company is
qualified for advising on such senior appointments.
He asks: ''Is there not something odd about a company of Andrew Rait
Ltd's financial status doing the head-hunting for the chief executives
of water authorities with, as the advert says, 'annual income ranging
from #100m to #200m+'?''
In a statement released yesterday, Andrew Rait Ltd said it had been
operating successfully in the executive search business for 20 years and
had been responsible for more than 60 board-level appointments in the
past seven years.
The business had been run financially successfully during the past 10
years, with significant reserves being accumulated outside the company.
The statement added that ''difficult trading during the recession
resulted in financial losses which were underwritten by Mr Rait
personally, a situation which was accepted by the company's auditors,
bankers, suppliers, and clients.
''All the resulting obligations had been fulfilled in punctilious
detail. The company has been trading profitably for the last 18 months
with every sign that this will continue.''
* Meanwhile, Mr Allan Stewart, Industry Minister at the Scottish
Office, has written to Mr Robertson claiming that using private finance
to help fund the #5000m investment programme for water and sewerage to
meet new standards will help to safeguard Government spending on vital
services such as health and education. On current estimates, he said,
private finance could bring in some 20% of the total amount of money
needed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article