Senior executives of the Rugby Football League have taken pay cuts to ease the financial pressures caused by the suspension of the game due to the coronavirus pandemic.
All fixtures were postponed on March 16, initially to April 3 but then suspended indefinitely, and some clubs have already reduced the wages of staff and players as they brace themselves for a lengthy period of inactivity.
The RFL has made no announcement but the PA news agency understands that all senior executives and board members, led by chairman Simon Johnson, agreed to a salary reduction more than a week ago.
The move comes at a time when the RFL is asking the Government for financial assistance to help keep clubs afloat while there is is no match-day income and Super League personnel look set to follow suit.
Super League officials have already cancelled the television show “Inside Super League” as a cost-cutting measure and executive chairman Robert Elstone told a media briefing that furloughing for employees is being considered.
“We’ve spent time looking at our staff base and furloughing is an option for a large number of our employees,” Elstone said.
“We’ve got to respect the fact we have to work that through, communicate with our staff and do it professionally and sympathetically.”
Wigan and England prop George Burgess told an Australian television show that some of the higher-earning Super League players could be facing pay cuts of up to 75 per cent and Toronto Wolfpack’s former All Black Sonny Bill Williams says he would support such a move.
“A 100 per cent I’d be that way inclined,” Williams told Sky Sports News.
“It would be ridiculous to think that in the circumstances we have found ourselves in to keep the game going in whatever sporting field we’re in that we wouldn’t be taking that pay cut.
“Young fellas coming through living paycheck to paycheck and paying off a mortgage would really struggle and in society in general, single mothers and single fathers and the homeless, its a tough time we find ourselves in.
“I consider myself in a really privileged position.
“In terms of sport, it’s crazy to think some teams, some organisations might not make it through.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here