Watford defender Christian Kabasele believes the potential Premier League return date of June 12 would be “impossible” and that action should not resume until later that month.
‘Project Restart’ is well under way as the English top flight attempts to resume action amid the coronavirus pandemic.
Phase one of small group training, respecting social distancing began this week after being voted through by clubs after testing got under way.
Defender Adrian Mariappa and two members of Watford’s staff returning positive Covid-19 tests ahead of the resumption of training, which Kabasele says cannot be rushed due to the threat of injury.
“Nothing has been confirmed yet,” he said of the Premier League’s return. “Personally I follow the news through the media because nothing has been official for the moment.
“We (see) speak about June 12. I think it is impossible because it would be less than three weeks training after a long period without doing anything, it’s a risk for us.
“I’m not sure, I don’t have any information but I think we are not going to start June 12.
“The most obvious choice for me is the end of June. Like this you have at least four weeks to train with the team if it’s possible.
“We will see. For the moment it’s a big question mark on this.”
Kabasele underlined the need for “proper preparation” on the Counter Attack podcast, where he was asked about Troy Deeney’s stance on the coronavirus.
The Hornets skipper said he will not return to training, citing concerns over his five-month-old son who has breathing difficulties, and over the Office of National Statistics data which shows black people and those from other ethnic minorities suffer disproportionately from Covid-19.
“The club has been very clear, really clear with that – every individual player is making his own choice,” Kabasele said.
“They are not putting pressure on us to say ‘you have to be back’. It’s about the player, the player’s feelings and every personal situation.
“For the moment, they came to us with phase one and personally I was quite happy with what they present to us, so we will see what they are planning for phase two and phase three.
“If it was starting tomorrow training 11 v 11 with contact, with everybody at the training ground, I would not go that’s for sure.
“But with phase one, personally I think everything is put in place and they have tried to make the training ground as safe as possible.”
Boss Pearson, who revealed on Friday that two more of his players have gone into isolation after family members tested positive for the virus, is of a similar mindset.
He said: “I’ll give you an answer to that when we get into training which is a bit more meaningful in terms of contact.
“Is four weeks and three days enough? No – normally you would want six weeks. Players haven’t lost their general fitness, and their programmes have been gradually changed to meet individual needs or managing long term issues.
“Once we get back into training mode where it’s very dynamic and we are hitting higher intensity, players need time to adapt.
“They are athletes these days and people sometimes turn their nose up at that, but we want our players to be fit and available, and we invest a lot of time and energy and money in the maintenance of our assets because when we do restart, the stakes are high.
“I don’t want to be going back into this without having ample time to prepare. We’ve approached the situation very pragmatically and there’s going to be an element of flexibility as well. We are working towards an outcome that we are going to be playing again – but it’s got to be for the right reasons.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here