On May 31, 2004 Chelsea sacked Claudio Ranieri after four years in charge.
Here, the PA news agency takes a look back at his dismissal and his spell at Stamford Bridge.
The Tinkerman
Italian Ranieri took over from Gianluca Vialli in September 2000 and quickly earned the nickname ‘Tinkerman’ for constantly changing his team around. He delivered Champions League football for the first time in 2003 and took them to the FA Cup final in 2002, but could not take them to the very top of the English game.
Paying the price
His job changed forever in 2003 when Roman Abramovich took over the west London club. Suddenly, Ranieri had endless money to spend, splashing out £120million ahead of the 2003-04 season. But with that came expectation and it soon became clear that Abramovich was not going to settle for anything less than the best. The Russian was spotted with England manager Sven-Goran Eriksson shortly after becoming owner and the axe was hanging over his head. Despite that, he led Chelsea to second place, their best-ever Premier League finish at that time – finishing only behind invincible Arsenal -while they also got to the last four of the Champions League.
The Special One
Despite that improvement it was not enough for Abramovich, who pulled the trigger not long after the season finished, with Ranieri gaining sympathy across the football community. He was replaced by Porto manager Jose Mourinho and although Abramovich received criticism for the decision, it was an inspired appointment as the self-appointed Special One delivered back-to-back Premier League titles. Ranieri went on to manage a host of top European clubs and eventually got his hands on the Premier League trophy 12 years after leaving Chelsea when he led Leicester to an incredible title.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here