Kai Havertz has insisted Chelsea’s players must take responsibility for slipping to Saturday’s frustrating 3-3 Premier League draw with Southampton.
Havertz shouldered the blame for Saints’ first goal, admitting losing possession for Danny Ings’ smart finish “changed the game”.
Chelsea had been 2-0 up and cruising after Timo Werner’s fine brace, but Ings’ fourth league goal of the new campaign teed up a madcap second-half.
Che Adams equalised for Saints after a defensive mix-up between Kepa Arrizabalaga and Kurt Zouma, only for Havertz to put Chelsea back in front.
The Germany midfielder’s first league goal for the Blues could not win the day however, as Jannik Vestergaard’s added-time effort forced a draw at Stamford Bridge.
“We’re very frustrated about the result,” Havertz told Chelsea’s official club website.
“We had 42 good minutes in the first-half but then I made a mistake and we conceded a goal, which changed the game a little bit.
“We got it to 3-2 and then we had to take the result and get the win at home but we didn’t do it.
“Now we have to stick together and hopefully we can do better next time.
“We have to take responsibility for that; we have 11 players on the pitch and everybody has to work hard so we don’t concede goals like this.
“It’s not always one person who makes the mistake so we have to look at our mistakes and try to solve the problems.
“It would have been great if my goal was the winner. Of course, I’m happy with that but very frustrated too about the result.
“We had to take these three points at home and we can do that so it was a bad day for us.”
Chelsea must move quickly onto Tuesday’s Champions League opener against Europa League champions Sevilla at Stamford Bridge, with boss Frank Lampard aware of the scale of improvements required.
The Blues boss has maintained however that formation switches are not to blame for Chelsea’s leaky defence.
“I don’t think it’s conceding goals in relation to the shape of the team, that’s something for me to think about all the time,” said Lampard.
“I’m not dead-set on playing that formation, there were loads of great things from the 4-2-3-1.
“But it is something we need to continue working on, because it is a change.”
Saints’ last-gasp goalscorer Vestergaard insisted Ralph Hasenhuttl’s side were full value for their point in west London.
“It was challenging, a high-paced game; they came at us fast and often,” he told Southampton’s official club website.
“We deserved to be down and had to fight our way back into the game.
“It’s difficult to come back from such situations, but that we did is massive.
“Based on the second-half the draw was deserved.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here