Erling Haaland swatted aside the criticism of Roy Keane after blasting Manchester City to an emphatic win over Wolves with four goals.
Former Manchester Untied midfielder Keane compared the prolific City striker to a “League Two player” when referring to his general play last month.
Haaland put those remarks aside with a devastating return to top form as City crushed Wolves 5-1 to retain control of the Premier League title race.
“I don’t really care that much about that man, so that’s all right,” said Haaland in an interview with a broadcaster from his native Norway.
Any bitterness is likely rooted in Keane’s long-running feud with Haaland’s father Alf-Inge. Keane was notoriously sent off for a horrific tackle on Haaland senior in 2001.
Haaland stunned Wolves with a first-half hat-trick, two of which were penalties, and took his tally for the campaign to 36 in all competitions with a brilliant fourth.
Substitute Julian Alvarez wrapped up the scoring as City moved back within a point of leaders Arsenal at the top of the table with a game in hand.
“We just have to win our games now, relax tonight and focus on Fulham,” Haaland added.
Haaland scored 52 goals in his brilliant first season at City and manager Pep Guardiola insisted any drop-off in form this term is largely down to his injury problems.
Guardiola said: “He was injured. To come back to his best form, he needs time. He is so tall. He’s not like Jeremy (Doku) or Phil (Foden).
“I’m happy for his performance and his exceptional goals, and the penalties as well because we know how sometimes they are not easy.
“But the second and the fourth were unbelievable. I’m really pleased for him.”
City have three games remaining compared to Arsenal’s two.
Guardiola said: “It was a better result than performance. People see 5-1 but I don’t have the feeling that was really good.
“But we are happy with the result. Now we have to take nine points, otherwise Arsenal will win the title.”
Wolves boss Gary O’Neil felt City’s first penalty, awarded after a clash between Josko Gvardiol and Rayan Ait-Nouri, was debatable but admitted City deserved their victory.
O’Neil, whose side mustered a consolation through Hwang Hee-chan, said: “The first penalty, I thought, was a really poor decision. It was a strange one.
“But we have to take responsibility for the way the game unfolded. I think we made a lot of errors, unforced ones as well, which gave Manchester City some really good chances.
“You can get away with some mistakes against other teams but we knew we needed to try and be as close to perfect as possible here, and we fell short on numerous occasions.
“That meant it was a fairly comfortable afternoon for Manchester City.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here