Jannik Sinner was left ruing a badly-timed bout of illness after ailing during a five-set loss to Daniil Medvedev in the Wimbledon quarter-finals.
The world number one held his head in his hands after calling the doctor early in the third set and was helped off court for a medical time-out.
A possible retirement looked on the cards but Sinner gradually improved on the resumption and may have won the match had he taken one of two set points in the third.
He managed to force a deciding set but it was Medvedev who eventually claimed a 6-7 (7) 6-4 7-6 (4) 2-6 6-3 victory after exactly four hours.
Sinner said: âAlready this morning I didnât feel great. I had some problems. Then, with the fatigue, it was tough. I was dizzy quite a lot. Actually off court I had a little bit the toughest time maybe.
âI didnât want to go off. The physio told me better to take some time because he watched me and I didnât seem in shape to play. It was not an easy moment. I tried to fight with what I had today.â
The Italian was determined to finish the match and shocked himself that he came so close to winning.
âI was also surprised that I pushed the match longer,â he said. âI donât want to retire if itâs only a little bit of illness or sick or whatever. I was still in shape to play somehow.
âThe fifth set I felt a little bit better again. Today the energy level was not consistent. Like this, itâs also not easy to handle the situations on the court.
âI was never thinking about retiring. For sure the crowd helped me a lot, trying to push me. You donât want to retire in a quarter-final of a grand slam.â
Sinner had won his previous five matches against Medvedev, including coming from two sets down in the Australian Open final, and he went into the clash as the favourite.
âI felt like I was playing some good tennis,â said Sinner. âI had tough opponents to reach this point. But it also gives you confidence when you beat certain players.
âItâs tough because I felt like that I was feeling the ball in a very positive way. Also today I tried. Just the ending was not what I wanted.â
Sinner had edged a very tight first set, taking it 9-7 on a tie-break after Medvedev double-faulted, but he began to look off colour during the second set and called the doctor after dropping serve to trail 2-1 in the third.
On the resumption he tried to shorten the points, frequently deploying the drop shot, and he got his reward for staying in touch when Medvedev played a loose game serving for the set at 5-4.
Sinner then had two set points in the Russianâs next service game but missed a makeable backhand on the second and it was Medvedev who took the tie-break this time, sealing it with an ace.
The momentum swung again when Sinner clinched a quick fourth but it was Medvedev who was stronger in the big moments in the decider.
The fifth seed has already equalled his best run at Wimbledon and, if he is to go further, he will have to reverse the result of last yearâs semi-final when he takes on Carlos Alcaraz on Friday.
Medvedev said: âFor me, what was important today is I lost five times to him. It was important to come out today and show that, look, weâre going to play probably many more times if we are both on tour, probably semis, quarters, finals, whatever.
âIt was important to just show Iâm always going to be there, Iâm always going to fight, Iâm always going to try to make your life difficult. Maybe youâre going to win more, maybe Iâm going to win more, I donât know, but Iâm going to fight.
âThatâs the same with Carlos last year in the US Open. Thatâs going to be the same with Carlos in a couple of days.â
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.Â
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.Â
That is invaluable.Â
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalistâs job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readersâ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readersâ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the âreport this postâ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here