MANY people missed it but Chancellor Philip Hammond’s announcement that HMRC will become a secondary preferential creditor in business insolvencies from 2020 could discourage the banks from lending to companies.
Donald McNaught, head of restructuring at Johnston Carmichael, said that the abolition of HMRC’s status as a preferred creditor was one of the key changes made to the insolvency regime by the Enterprise Act 2002.
Together with the introduction of the “prescribed part”, the change was designed to promote a rescue culture and ensure that unsecured creditors, often sole traders or SMEs, got a better deal upon insolvency.
But prescribed part, essentially a ring-fenced fund that must be made available to unsecured creditors in a liquidation or administration, “has not resulted in much money flowing back to HMRC”, said Mr McNaught.
“It certainly hasn’t been enough to compensate them,” he said. “We need some more detail on the mechanics of it but in terms of enterprise it could discourage lenders.”
John McAuslin, partner at Johnston Carmichael, said: “The rules changed and HMRC were treated like ordinary creditors as part of moves to prevent abuse – this change will bring in just over £600 million and the Chancellor will have viewed this as quite an easy win as the Government strives to end austerity.”
Under the Chancellor’s plans, from April 6, 2020, when a business enters insolvency, more of the taxes paid in good faith by its employees and customers, and temporarily held in trust by the business, will go to fund public services rather than being distributed to other creditors.
However, the reform will only apply to taxes collected and held by businesses on behalf of other taxpayers, such as VAT and employee NICs. The rules will remain unchanged for taxes owed by businesses themselves, such as Corporation Tax and employer NICs.
Mr Hammond said: “We’ll make HMRC a preferred creditor in business insolvencies to ensure that tax which has been collected on behalf of HMRC is actually paid to HMRC.”
At insolvency and restructuring trade body R3, chief executive Emma Lovell agreed the announcement that HMRC is to partially regain its preferred creditor status in business insolvency could “potentially be a retrograde and damaging step to UK plc if not thought through carefully”.
“It will amount to a tax on creditors, including small businesses, pension funds, suppliers and lenders, and reverses a status quo that has been encouraging business rescue since 2002,” Ms Lovell said.
“R3’s members report that HMRC could do more to engage actively in insolvency procedures, and at an earlier stage. HMRC has a wide-ranging toolkit to help it to tackle abuse and evasion, which could be used more fully, instead of forcing its way to the top of the queue by legislation.”
Ms Lovell added: “HMRC considers itself to be an ‘involuntary creditor’ of businesses, because it cannot choose which companies to engage with. However, all suppliers to businesses are ‘involuntary creditors’ and have to take commercial risks, and this announcement will hugely increase the risks taken by small enterprises trying to do business.”
She warned that the Chancellor’s announcement “risks throwing away much of the recent progress that has been made” by the Government in recent months to improve and strengthen the UK’s business rescue framework”.
Government has moved in recent months to improve and strengthen the UK's business rescue framework, which R3 has welcomed. However, this announcement risks throwing away much of the recent progress that has been made. “We hope that the Government will reconsider this move and listen to concerns of the insolvency and restructuring profession as it consults on the issue over the coming months,” Ms Lovell said.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article