PERHAPS we are at risk of catching something more deadly than a respiratory infection as Covid-19 multiplies and spreads. In Glasgow this week a friend encountered a much more lethal contagion. On a visit to the supermarket she witnessed a man exiting with a trolley containing “enough infant formula to feed triplets for the first year of life and much more”.
Later, she learned of a customer bulk-buying anti-bacterial soap for the purposes of making a quick buck on ebay. Presumably, in households such as these families will hunker down before the night-time news bulletin to await the latest increase in coronavirus infections. “Ya beauty, it’s now reached Glasgow. Let’s lift the price to £20 a bottle.”
As the Coronavirus advances, it’s being tailed by an erosion of human decency; a poisoning of the soul. Thus, human empathy flees and is replaced by something dismal: the urge to view other people as competitors who must be eliminated in the struggle for survival. This is what happens when civilisations collapse in on themselves.
Last week it was reported that Roberto Giuliani, the director of Rome’s Santa Cecilia Conservatory, one of the world’s oldest music institutes, told students from China, Japan and South Korea they were forbidden to attend classes until they were certifiably free of the virus. Ignorance never lags far behind callousness.
In Canada, Germany and the UK coronavirus-related racism directed at Asians has increased sharply. In France, the social media hashtag #JeNeSuisPasUnVirus is being used by Chinese people in response to the racism they are beginning to encounter. The Guardian reported one woman who took to Twitter to say: “Not all Asians are Chinese. Not all Chinese were born in China and not all have been there. An Asian who coughs doesn’t have the coronavirus. Insulting an Asian because of the virus is like insulting a Muslim because of the bombings.”
On Facebook this week the award-winning journalist Audrey Gillan, a former and much-loved colleague, offered a rebuke to the greed and ignorance wrought by the coronavirus. Ms Gillan’s reporting assignments have taken her to some of the world’s most crisis-torn areas and she knows more than most how the quality of mercy can prevail. “If you're on your own in London and you have to self-isolate because of the coronavirus please do shout,” she wrote.
“There are a number of us who are in the same boat. We're not panicking. But we are cooking things and freezing them, just in case. I had a debilitating virus that floored me for eight days in January so I have a little bit of experience of how tricky that is when you are on your own and I know that cooked food, some fresh vegetables and fruit, and whatever little things you might need will be welcome. We only promise to leave it outside your door so nae hugs. Okay pals?” Ms Gillan hails from Glasgow’s east end.
In the way we are inclined to react when a pathogen is on the loose there are parallels to be found in our attitudes towards those whom we perceive as a threat to our way of life. Immigrant communities and those fleeing terror from brutal regimes are already accustomed to being regarded as virulent. We round them up; isolate and detain them and then pack them off to their country of origin using some minor refraction real or imagined.
Those we give leave to remain must first be doused in the healing waters of a UK history exam which conveniently omits to mention any of those gnarly deeds of empire which caused them ultimately to seek peace here. We haven’t yet got round to forcing them to wear bells around their necks and shout “Unclean! Unclean!” but the Tories’ Windrush project was a close approximation.
We ascribe to them, in the manner of a pandemic, all sorts of anti-social behaviours and deploy our Conservative-leaning newspapers to de-humanise them and portray them as a danger to the British way of life. Only after we consider them safe and have absorbed them safely into the UK bloodstream do we permit a limited number – at a distance – to share in this nation’s bounty, much of which is built on what we looted from their countries in the first place.
The instinct towards the survival of the fittest, which lies at the heart of Tory doctrine, comes to the fore when a global pandemic begins to rattle. In 2017, the prestigious US think-tank Brookings studied how poor countries and disadvantaged communities suffer disproportionately when pandemics roar. “Regardless of where a pandemic starts, once underway, the poor tend to bear the brunt. Low and middle-income countries have weaker health systems and limited capacity to handle surges in cases.”
The essay went on: “We can curtail pandemics if we quickly develop vaccines and make them widely accessible. However, without vigorous efforts to secure equitable access, vaccine distribution will follow the logic of the market. During the 2009 swine flu pandemic, wealthy countries secured large advance orders for vaccines, but, despite the efforts of the World Health Organisation to negotiate donations, poor countries were crowded out – receiving vaccines more slowly than rich countries and unable to cover as many of their citizens.”
At its most primitive level this tendency is evident in bulk-buying at supermarkets or filling up at petrol stations during an energy shortage. Those with economic muscle use it to hoard rather than to share; those without must endure as best they can. It’s a distillation of all Conservative philosophy. Global capitalism works by identifying or creating shortages and then exploiting them and keeping them out of the reach of the majority.
No mercy can ever be found here and anything that speaks of weakness; infirmity or poverty is deemed to be self-inflicted. When it can’t be explained away that simply it’s regarded as acceptable collateral damage.
We may not yet have seen the worst effects of Covid-19 before it blows itself out on its journey across the world. Already, though, we are witnessing its corrosive effects on the human spirit which are much more wretched than the physical toll. The only antidote is basic human compassion: the instinct to reach out and not to recoil; to share and not to accumulate.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel