I realised the other day that it’s an age since I last tasted and wrote about Champagne, so with Wimbledon in full swing and the summer definitely here at last, the fizz must flow.
While Prosecco and non-generic sparkling wines have been all the rage these last few years, they still can't compete with the grand old lady of bubbles, the quality of which has been incredible across the board over the last few years.
Only three grapes are allowed in Champagne and not all of them are used in every wine. The grapes are chardonnay, pinot noir and pinot meunier, the latter of which is probably a mystery to many drinkers.
Anyway, much of the blended Champagne uses all three, whereas Blanc de Noirs uses the two red grapes and Blanc de Blanc uses only chardonnay. The most common question I get asked is which style I prefer. The truth is, I love them all, bar perhaps the demi secs but I've never believed sugar and bubbles make a good combo.
Champagne really does go well with strawberries by the way, but they are also incredibly versatile wines to pair with other foods ranging from fried chicken and lobster, to pork dishes. The rose versions are particularly good with spicy takeaways.
Anyway, here's a few crackers to enjoy with the tennis. Good luck, Andy.
Follow me on twitter @gerardfinewine
Lete-Vautrain Cote 204 Brut NV
I've tasted this a few times and it's just lovely. Crisp apple notes and the occasional whiff of elderflower. Not one of the big boys but cracking value.
The Good Spirits Company £30
Delacourt Cuvee Rose Brut
Who needs strawberries when the flavours are abundant in the wine itself? There are hints of crushed raspberries, too. The finish is crisp and refreshing. Overall, a gorgeous wine for the price.
Marks & Spencer £22
Piper-Heidsieck Rosé Sauvage
Now for something a bit different. Piper have launched a fabulous limited edition rose presented in a gift box that is also a fully functioning barbecue. How's that for special?
Thefinestbubbles.com £120
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here