What is it?
A premium Android smartphone only lacking some minor features and minus a hefty price-tag.
Good points?
It's difficult to fathom the quality and power of such a cheap device as it sports Qualcomm's 888 5G processor chipset for fast gaming at less than £400.
A 16.3cm (6.43in) super AMOLED screen just about covers the entire front face, so no space is wasted. The image is sharp and responsive thanks to its 120Hz refresh rate and wide colour range capacity.
Performance is enhanced by 8GB RAM and 128GB storage which means you don't need to worry about deleting or archiving precious photographs in order to download the latest games or movies.
This task is also a breeze thanks to the latest 5G and WiFi 6 connectivity technology included.
As you would expect from a gaming orientated smartphone, its battery is huge with an 4500mAh capacity which will comfortably keep the device running for at least two days of moderate usage.
Supporting smart 65W SuperDart Charge technology allows a power conversion rate of 99 per cent to quickly replenish the battery from zero to 100% in 35 minutes. That equates to an extra 51 minutes of usage for a mere three minutes of charging.
Bad points?
The cameras could be better but only the super fussy would have a gripe here as the images are more than adequate for everyday usage.
A lack of wireless charging may be a deal breaker for those seeking convenience to maintain clear surfaces.
Best for ...
Those who want a feature-set you would have to pay double for with other manufacturer.
Avoid if ...
You have already purchased wireless charging pads ready for a new phone.
Score: 9/10.
Realme GT 5G smartphone, £399 (amazon.co.uk)
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here