SENIOR police officers, and the Scottish Under-Secretary of State, Norman Buchan, had urged Easterhouse residents to keep clear of a local stretch of vacant ground between 7pm and 8pm that Saturday, July 13, 1968. Mr Buchan said this was in order “to give disarmament a chance.”
The idea of a weapons amnesty for the gangs of Easterhouse had come from a visit to the area three days earlier by the entertainer Frankie Vaughan. He met gang leaders on their home turf, having told the Evening Times that “I feel I can do some good because the boys like and respect me and know I am not just a do-gooder.”
On the Saturday morning, youths who were leaving on holiday deposited a cache of weapons with a social worker who was the link man between Vaughan and the gangs. The weapons included three 12-inch daggers and a hatchet.
Three binfuls of weapons were handed in at the amnesty (right). The Evening Times acknowledged it was at least a start, and that work could now begin on phase two of the plan, the building of a ‘gang hut’ centre in Easterhouse. Hugh Brown, Labour MP for Pollok, who witnessed the amnesty, said he believed it had achieved a real breakthrough, and would be giving Mr Buchan a report.
Read more: Herald Diary
The amnesty and Mr Vaughan’s high-profile visit were a welcome respite from the area’s reputation for gang violence. Indeed, the singer’s intervention, and heavier sentences handed down at the High Court in Glasgow, were said to have contributed to the quietest opening weekend of the Glasgow Fair that city police could remember.
Later in the month, four local gang leaders went to Blackpool for a successful ‘peace conference’ with Vaughan.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here