A GROUP of independent Glasgow painters staged a series of weekend open-air art shows in Queen Margaret Drive in September 1956.
“A taxi-rank promised, at Saturday morning’s opening, a solid core of middle-of-the-road spectatorship”, wrote this newspaper’s art critic. “Out from the BBC across the road swarmed a succession of television cameramen and recording-machine operators like bees to a herbaceous border on their doorstep.
“Bus stop queues swelled the throng. Beards and blue jeans proliferated. Press photographers fed small children with sweets preparatory to posing them cutely before the canvas-covered railings of the Botanic Gardens”.
There was, however, a modicum of affectation; it was hard to understand why one artist’s “bright, streaky footballers should have the head of Martians”. Among the other artists taking part that Saturday were T. Macdonald, Bet Low, A. Fletcher, Charles Boyle (the youngest exhibitor), W. Rennie, and P. Lavalle.
But one artist, Drew MacDonald, was missing. The organisers had felt his 9ft by 2ft nude might be rather a shock for visitors, and asked him to withdraw it. He responded by withdrawing all five paintings he had intended exhibiting – even though he had won the draw for places and was entitled to the best site in the show.
“When I was told on Thursday that my picture could not be displayed I was very disappointed, especially when there was no selection committee”, he said. “By Saturday I had decided that as a form of protest I would not exhibit the other four pictures I had done for the show”.
With a smile he conceded that “although I am supposed to be sulking at the moment I think that move was probably a mistake”.
Read more: Herald Diary
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules here