THE opponents of artificial pitches were last night branded 'dinosaurs' by Hamilton Academical whose own plastic surface was voted the worst in the country.
Les Gray, vice-chairman of the Lanarkshire club, hit back at PFA Scotland chief Fraser Wishart who insisted the study carried out among his members proved players overwhelmingly preferred to play on grass.
Read more: Kevin Thomson: I am ready for first big manager's job with Livingston
New Douglas Park was voted bottom of the 42 professional pitches and fellow Premiership side Kilmarnock came in third last.
League bosses have no plans to force clubs to tear up their artificial pitches any time soon and Gray believes more will follow Hamilton. His club are installing a new 3G pitch over the summer at a cost of £750,000.
"I understand that 12 of the 42 clubs will have artificial surfaces next season," said Gray. "I believe that within ten years, up to 70 per cent of our senior teams won't be playing on grass.
"Those who do not think this is the way forward for Scottish football are dinosaurs.
Read more: Neil Cameron: The 1978 World Cup in Argentina summed up Scotland as a nation
"The technology is improving all the time and given the climate in this country, it makes complete sense to continue down this road.
"Our pitch is key for a club such as ourselves for so many reasons.
Promoted Livingston ripped up their pitch meaning a quarter of Premiership stadiums next season won't have natural grass.
Celtic and Hearts are installing hybrid surfaces which are a combination of grass and synthetic fibres.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel